[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Obviously. I have a feeling I'm missing something subtle here.
I think we're having a fair amount of mis-communication but I'm sure it will all sort itself out as we go along. > >This has the downside that all of the instances returned are > >of the same type within the same VM. I can envision a system > >where different caches are given to different parsers within > >the same VM. > > Fine; they can always change the value of the system property that > corresponds to the META-INF/services entry at appropriate junctures. I'd prefer *not* to use this method for the grammar caching since that's something that might change from parser to parser within the same VM. > So how soon do you figure it'll be before we're ready for me to put at > least the core API (the grammar loader) into CVS so we can get moving on > this? Except for the last bit, I think we're in general agreement. Once the changes are made, I'll go over them and make sure that they reflect the decisions we've made. -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
