On Friday 31 May 2002 18:14, David Brownell wrote: > > What is the localName in "foo:bar" and "foo:bar:foo" which are legal > > element names in XML 1.0 and should therefore be passed through when > > namespaces are off? > > I'd expect that localName would still be defined to be the syntactic > "strip off the only prefix" transform of qName that it is in other > cases ... so "foo:bar" would become "bar", and "foo:bar:foo" would > be an error (normally reported as an empty localName).
I don't think that makes much sense... If namespaces are off, then there is no such thing as a prefix to be stripped off. And raising an error for the latter would be a strange decision knowing that it's a legal name when namespaces are off. -- Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- for hire: http://robin.berjon.com/ Avoid clich�s like the plague. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
