DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9795>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9795 Bugs in the W3C XML Schema processor when validating against the SchemaForSchemas Summary: Bugs in the W3C XML Schema processor when validating against the SchemaForSchemas Product: Xerces2-J Version: 2.0.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: XML Schema Structures AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Henry Thompson just posted a new version of the SchemaForSchemas document (http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd). I ran this through Xerces 2.0.1 and I got the following four errors: [1] (1 of 43) Schema problem: Unknown base type 'xs:anySimpleType' for a type 'string' (For simpleType name="string") Henry's comment to this bug was: "That's just bogus, it's required to be present by the REC." [2] (2 of 43) Schema problem: Facet 'whiteSpace' is not allowed by this type. (For simpleType name="string") Both [1] and [2] occur for all the simpleTypes that derive from xs:anySimpleType [3] For the complexType "attributeGroupRef" the following errors are reported: (40 of 43) Schema problem: Group's occurrence range is not a valid restriction of base group's occurrence range. (41 of 43) Schema problem: Error for type 'attributeGroupRef'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base. [4] For the complexType "groupRef" the following errors are reported: (42 of 43) Schema problem: Group's occurrence range is not a valid restriction of base group's occurrence range. (43 of 43) Schema problem: Error for type 'groupRef'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base. The only one that isn't a bug is [3] which apparently have just been resolved in the XML Schema WG. The WG have decided to treet the sFs as a special case where it's allowed to place facets on xs:anySimpleType so this should be fixed in Xerces as well. For more information on this see the follwing emails: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00399.html http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00446.html Cheers, /Eddie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
