Hi Stefan,
Yes, this sure makes sense to me. Wonder why I didn't do that in the first
place...
Thanks for pointing this out.
Cheers,
Neil
Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Stefan Geelen" |
| | <stefan.geelen@xe|
| | ntri.com> |
| | |
| | 09/04/2002 03:24 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | xerces-j-dev |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: org.apache.xerces.impl.Version.getVersion() should be static ?
|
|
|
|
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hi,
I suppose org.apache.xerces.impl.Version.getVersion() should be static so
it is possible to call the method directly as in:
System.err.println("= Xalan build: "+org.apache.xalan.Version.getVersion
());
System.err.println("= Xerces build: "
+org.apache.xerces.impl.Version.getVersion());
This way the org.apache.xalan.Version.getVersion()) is called, so should
the xerces method be called.
Right ?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
