Aleksander Slominski wrote: > namespace context seems like optional data - i think that > in configurations that do not implement namespaces but > just XML 1.0 it would be null right?
I think that you would be in a small minority. Most people these days consider XML 1.0 + Namespaces as "the XML". And things like the Skunkworks spec does combine the two. > i strongly believe in backward compatibility as > (it helps to grow usable programs and APIs) > and breaking it only when it is absolutely required. I agree. But we should definitely agree on a time when we all consider it to be version 1.0. Neil suggested the end of this year for that cutoff and that is probably enough time if we put some serious effort into the API. -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
