DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692

keys with unions containing subelements not handled propertly

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-15 22:02 -------
Hi John.  OK; should now be fixed in CVS.  Note that I've applied a rather 
different patch from that which you suggested.  I think you were on the right 
track, but the simplest thing to do was fix the isMatched() method so that it 
actually looks at whether the first location path that match is really in a non-
matching state (because it matched previously and is waiting for the right 
endElement call to be reset).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to