DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882 incorrect validation of restrictions of any ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-24 16:44 ------- I don't see how this sequence fits the pointlessness rules: <sequence> One of the following must be true: 2.2.1 {particles} is empty. 2.2.2 All of the following must be true: 2.2.2.1 The particle within which this <sequence> appears has {max occurs} and {min occurs} of 1. 2.2.2.2 One of the following must be true: 2.2.2.2.1 The <sequence>'s {particles} has only one member. 2.2.2.2.2 The particle within which this <sequence> appears is itself among the {particles} of a <sequence>. It doesn't fit 2.2.1, so to be pointless it must fit 2.2.2.1 and (2.2.2.2.1 or 2.2.2.2.2) It fits 2.2.2.1: "The particle within which this <sequence> appears" is the outer sequence, and that does have "{max occurs} and {min occurs} of 1." It doesn't fit 2.2.2.2.1: it has more than 1 member. It doesn't fit 2.2.2.2.2: "The particle within which this <sequence> appears" is the outer sequence, and that is not "itself among the {particles} of a <sequence>." Do I interpret something incorrectly here? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
