Hi Neil, > I would point out, though, that > you're perfectly free to read the schema document into a DOM tree yourself; > you'll get no less information this way. Even if the fDocument field did > have useful data it still wouldn't help you access Xerces representation of > the grammar.
What I actually tried to do with the code is probing what getGrammarDocument() will give me. I was hoping it to be a valid template of some sort for the XML document, based on XML Schema. But if I understand you correctly, this fDocument will give just the same thing the DOMParser#parse(schema document) will give me then.. ? Argh.. > But as to your problem: Your best bet is to look through the code of > XMLValidator will try to do so. My 'programming-experience' is only 2 months old so far, so I hope you won't be bothered with a lot more questions from me.. One small newbie question; is there any plan to elaborate the API documentation in near future.. ? > Keep me informed on how your project goes. You've picked a very tough > problem to work on Gaaa... > Best of luck, Will need it :P and thx for the pointer. I'll look at the XMLValidator later today :) cath
