Title: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Xerces 2.0.0 (beta) Release

Any idea when it will support Schema?

    -----Original Message-----
    From:   Bob Jamison [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:37 AM
    To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Subject:        Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xerces 2.0.0 (beta) Release

    Andy Clark wrote:

    >I'm very pleased to announce the release of Xerces 2.0.0 (beta).
    >The Xerces2 beta release has been greatly improved since the
    >alpha release with an updated Xerces Native Interface (XNI) core;
    >the addition of the parser pipeline and configuration interfaces
    >to XNI; and completely re-written documentation, including lots
    >of new information about XNI. The beta release is available from
    >the Xerces-J distribution directory:
    >
    http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/
    >
    >Xerces2 has support for XML 1.0; Namespaces; DOM 2.0 (including
    >events, traversal, and range); SAX 2.0; and JAXP 1.1. Xerces2
    >does not yet support XML Schema and has removed support for the
    >deferred DOM implementation.
    >
    >Xerces2 is a nearly complete rewrite of the Xerces 1.x codebase
    >in order to make the code cleaner, more modular, and easier to
    >maintain. Applications using only the standard interfaces such
    >as JAXP, DOM, and SAX should not see any differences.
    >
    >To get involved with Xerces2 development: download the beta
    >release, subscribe to the xerces-j-dev mailing list, and start
    >writing really great code!
    >
    Works great! We replaced the Xerces1.4 jar in our app, and
    it worked with only minor modifications.  So it is definitely
    used in in a real-world app here.

    The only major difference is how we access TEXT_NODEs
    within an element.  For example, if you had a tag like:

    <sometext>&quot;<![CDATA[Hello,]]>world&quot;</sometext>

    gathering up all of the TEXT_NODEs in 1.4 would result in:

    "Hello, world"

    in 2.0.0b, we get

    world

    ..as now it apparently treats TEXT_NODEs,
    ENTITY_REFERENCE_NODEs, and CDATA_SECTION_NODEs
    separately.  Once we take this into account, everything works fine.
    Is this proper operation?

    Anyway, 2.0 is looking pretty good, thanks for your efforts.



    Bob






    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to