not if JAXP is used.  JAXP by-passes the classpath rule and instead takes
the first jar in the classpath that contains the
META-INF/services/JAXP-specific-files.  however older versions up to, but
not including 1.4.3 did not contain the proper files, tho Crimson does.  i'm
not sure if Xerces2 has these files or not as i'm still using the old
Xerces.

-----Original Message-----
From: Swanson, Brion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Help, Xerces 2.0 beta install problem


I'm running this under SunOS 5.7 with 4 CPUs and plenty of memory and
storage (it used to be a production machine - possibly still is for old
products).

The only thing I can find in my classpath that might contains an old Xerces
version is Xalan2.  However, that appears after my Xerces2 JAR, so it should
check the Xerces2 classes before it reaches the Xerces1 classes bundled with
Xalan, correct?

--------------
Brion Swanson

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help, Xerces 2.0 beta install problem

What kind of environment are you running this under? Is there 
any possible way that it could be using the old Xerces JAR
file?

I don't see anything in your code that would be causing the
problem you are seeing. As long as you stick with using the
standard XML interface (DOM, SAX, JAXP, etc), you should be
shielded from any implementation changes.

-- 
Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to