Sorry, my question is not correctly phrased.
My original schema doesn't have any named types defined.
So the right question would be: can an element be redefined if it's not derived from a named type?
- vlad
---------------------- Forwarded by Vlad Epshtein/Systems/NandS/BMO on 10/18/2001 05:40 PM ---------------------------
Date:10/18/2001 05:32 PM | Vlad Epshtein
- Tel:416-549-6177 Bank of Montreal Group of Companies |
To: xerces-j-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Is it possible to redefine schema elements? Link
Thanks, for your answer Neil,
Does it mean that there is no way to redefine a schema that doesn't have any named types in it?
Vlad
Please respond to xerces-j-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: xerces-j-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Is it possible to redefine schema elements?
Hi Vlad,
No, you can't redefine elements. But since you can redefine the type of
the element in question--if it is of a named type that is--by simply
redefining the type you'll have redefined the element. Remember that it's
the redefined type that's used with an element in the redefined schema, not
the original type.
For details, see Section 4.2.2 of the Schema Structures spec.
HTH,
Neil
Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/18/2001 04:45:10 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xerces-j-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Is it possible to redefine schema elements?
Hello,
I cannot access the archives, so please forgive me if this question has
already been answered here.
Does anybody know if it's possible to redefine schema elements of an
included schema similar to the way we can redefine types?
vlad
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
