On Tuesday 19 February 2002 08:19 pm, you wrote: > "Anthony W. Marino" wrote: > > Why does Xerces1 processes differently than Xerces2? > > Because it's implemented differently. > > However, this is clearly a place where the code needs to be > changed to optimize the behavior. There's no reason to read > the input character by character once the parser scans the > TextDecl or discovers that the document doesn't have one.
I guess that was my silent point since X2 is the next generation it should also exhibit performance improvements. Is this one of the things that Xerces2 group is working on as well? Thank You, Anthony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
