Thanks for your tip. --- Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From what I've seen Xerces2 performance is better > for smaller documents, > while Xerces1 is better for larger documents. Your > file is a large one > by my standards. > > Xerces1 appeared to have a lot of initialization > overhead for a parse. > The Xerces2 code avoids that overhead, but long term > performance on > larger documents definitely suffers as shown by your > timings. It'd be > great if the Xerces2 performance on larger documents > could be improved > to match Xerces1. > > - Dennis > > Yonghui Chen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have just tried 3 parsers, Xerces Java 1, Xerce > Java 2 and Crimson, > > use both DOM and SAX parser parse a 960kb XML file > for 10 times, the > > time cost are: > > > > Xerces 1 Xerces 2 Crimson > > > > DOM 3906 4937 4697 > > > > SAX 1322 1832 1332 > > > > It is said that my best choose is Xerces1. So, > what's the improves in > > Xerces 2? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
