"Thornton, Marc" wrote: > Any caveats anyone is aware of in using this solution? I know that when I > already had a DTD declaration in my XML, I received an error based on the > format of the header (either DOCTYPE or ?xml version info) when I used this > approach.
What you really want to do you can only partially accomplish today. However, we're planning a DTD caching mechanism that would allow you to cache essential grammars as well as enforce that only a certain grammar is used for a document. But you'll have to wait because we're just in the talking/design phase. -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
