I downloaded the TurboXML editor to test the differences I found between Xerces and XMLSpy. It seems like TurboXML works like XMLSpy in this matter. I was allowed to construct the schema below with TurboXML.
Does this mean that both XMLSpy and TurboXML have implemented the spec incorrectly? /Peter <?xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"?> <!--Generated by Turbo XML 2.3.0.100. Conforms to w3c http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema--> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; elementFormDefault = "qualified"> <xsd:element name = "Not"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:simpleContent> <xsd:restriction base = "xsd:string"> <xsd:enumeration value = "FOOOO"/> <xsd:enumeration value = "BAAAR"/> <xsd:enumeration value = "KAKAKAK"/> <xsd:attribute name = "OrderID" use = "required" type = "xsd:string"/> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleContent> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> </xsd:schema> ------------- > > > > This is not valid according to the spec : > > > > [[ > > Schema Component Constraint: Complex Type Definition Properties Correct > > All of the following must be true: > > 1 The values of the properties of a complex type definition > > must be as described in the property tableau in The Complex Type > > Definition Schema Component (�3.4.1), modulo the impact of Missing > > Sub-components (�5.3). > > 2 If the {base type definition} is a simple type definition, > > the {derivation method} must be extension. > > 3 ... > > ]] > > > > The second point says that simple type definitions should be derived by > > extension. > > > > HTH > > -Pavani > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
