Great! So there's a real need for the thing! Representing errors (schema violations) as objects looks like the way it should be. Obviously, different errors will have different sets of data (the arguments to XMLErrorReporter.reportError() call). If we had a dom (W3C DOM, JDOM, dom4j, ...) builder integrated in Xerces (via XNI), we could even return the node as an object.
Jan Torsten Curdt wrote: > > God loves me - someone else wants exactly the same as I want :-)) > ...almost... > > I was always wondering why the xpath isn't passed with errors!! > > But I'd like go even a little further... I like to have some kind of an > error object/facet whatever which tells what failed not only as a human > readable message... so one can process it programmatically.... > -- > Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
