Hi,

I am actually in Canada too, in "sunny" Vancouver :). I will redo my tests
and let you know if the other problems persist.

Muchas gracias,
Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: caching of grammars that include other grammars
>
>
> Hi Torsten and Alek,
>
> You're not being ignored--it was a long weekend up here in Canada, so I
> haven't been on line to see these messages.  Now I'm here, so I'll try and
> answer:
>
> The first problem you found--where an included schema would be flagged as
> being in error for having a non-identical namespace even when it had an
> identical target namespace--was fixed in CVS soon after 2.0.2 went out.
>
> The other two I don't know about; if you could send a (preferably
> trimmed-down) test case, I'll do the best I can to look into them.  Sure
> sounds like bugs though...
>
> Hope that helps,
> Neil
> Neil Graham
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
> E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> |--------+------------------------>
> |        |          Torsten Curdt |
> |        |          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> |        |          >             |
> |        |                        |
> |        |          07/02/2002    |
> |        |          06:22 AM      |
> |        |          Please respond|
> |        |          to            |
> |        |          xerces-j-user |
> |        |                        |
> |--------+------------------------>
>
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------|
>   |
>                                                         |
>   |      To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                                                         |
>   |      cc:
>                                                         |
>   |      Subject:     Re: caching of grammars that include other
> grammars                                                 |
>   |
>                                                         |
>   |
>                                                         |
>
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
> On Monday 01 July 2002 22:38, Aleksandar Milanovic wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Few days ago I sent two emails about problems related to
> caching grammars
> > (schemas) that include other grammars. Isn't there anybody competent to
> > answer these questions?
>
> Same here... we must have been just ignored... :-/
> --
> Torsten
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to