I looked into this briefly. Unfortunately, Xerces code does not strike me as being straightforward. Even if I found a way to fix it for one case, I have no way of knowing whether it would work in all cases. The bad part about the current handling of attributes whose form is explicitly qualified is that Xerces makes a valid document invalid by validating it :). I find this to be ridiculous. I'd rather have Xerces not even add the attribute, because then at least the document would remain valid.
Thanks, Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Aleksandar Milanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: question about new release 2.2.1 > > > Sure. > Could I get some tips as to which part of code handles adding PSVI to a > document and how namespace declarations (or a stack thereof) are > maintained > as a document is being parsed/validated. A few class names would suffice. > > thx > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > Aleksandar Milanovic | Privileged or confidential information may be > Product Architect | contained in this message. If this message was > Cartagena Project | not intended for you, destroy it and notify us > Galdos Systems Inc. | immediately. Opinions, conclusions, > Tel: (604) 484-2750 | recommendations, and other information > presented > Fax: (604) 484-2755 | in this message are not given or necessarily > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | endorsed by my employer or firm. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:44 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: question about new release 2.2.1 > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I guess Sandy's still thinking about it. Patches always welcome! :) > > > > Cheers, > > Neil > > Neil Graham > > XML Parser Development > > IBM Toronto Lab > > Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > |---------+----------------------------> > > | | "Aleksandar | > > | | Milanovic" | > > | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| > > | | sinc.com> | > > | | | > > | | 11/14/2002 02:28 | > > | | PM | > > | | Please respond to| > > | | xerces-j-user | > > | | | > > |---------+----------------------------> > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ----------| > > | > > > > | > > | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > | > > | cc: > > > > | > > | Subject: RE: question about new release 2.2.1 > > > > | > > | > > > > | > > | > > > > | > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ----------| > > > > > > > > I am sure it is :). BTW, the only bug I've ever submitted is > still lurking > > in this new shiny product :). Its description is available at: > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 > > > > > > thx > > Alex > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:59 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: question about new release 2.2.1 > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Hmmm; perhaps it was just the noNamespaceSchemaLocation > property... See > > > [1]. Oh well, 2.2.1 is a considerably better product; it's worth the > > > upgrade. :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Neil > > > [1]: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13719 > > > Neil Graham > > > XML Parser Development > > > IBM Toronto Lab > > > Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 > > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |---------+----------------------------> > > > | | "Aleksandar | > > > | | Milanovic" | > > > | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| > > > | | sinc.com> | > > > | | | > > > | | 11/14/2002 01:16 | > > > | | PM | > > > | | Please respond to| > > > | | xerces-j-user | > > > | | | > > > |---------+----------------------------> > > > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ----------| > > > | > > > > > > | > > > | To: "Xerces-J-User" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > | > > > | cc: > > > > > > | > > > | Subject: question about new release 2.2.1 > > > > > > | > > > | > > > > > > | > > > | > > > > > > | > > > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ----------| > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I noticed that this release has the following bug fix "Made the > > > external-schema-location property work again.". I am puzzled by this, > > > because we're using this property with Xerces 2.2.0, and it is working > > > fine. > > > What was the problem? > > > > > > thx > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
