Jean Georges PERRIN wrote:
I am parsing a 3 Kb XHTML file and it takes me about 4s, cloning the tree
takes me roughly a ridiculous amount of time (10ms). This on an Athlon XP
1800+ running XP (sure I could switch to Linux but it is not planned for now
:) ).
Is 10 milliseconds "ridiculous" because it's an 1800+ MHz
machine? Or is the s/ms a typo of some sort? I'm surprised
that it takes you 4s to parse a 3Kb file. On my 650 MHz
laptop (with incredibly slow internal IO), I can parse
megabytes in that time.
You might want to try turning off the deferred DOM feature
in order to decrease the clone time. This will, however,
increase the parse time. Also, are your numbers only for
the first parse/clone of the document? What about following
runs using same parser/document?
--
Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
