Hi Pae,

I can't really speculate as to what will be in the next release, and when
it will be released. One of the Xerces-J committers would probably have a
better idea about those items.

-----------------------------
Michael Glavassevich
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
4B Computer Engineering
University of Waterloo

On Mon, 12 May 2003, Pae Choi wrote:

> Michael,
>
> Thank you for your prompt reply as well as the patch. Should we
> expect the patch in the next release? If so, would you share
> the release plan? Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Pae
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Rafael Glavassevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 5:14 PM
> Subject: [PATCH]: "standalone" in the XML declaration, <?xml ... ?>
>
>
> > It looks like a bug in the parser.
> >
> > Changing lines 859 & 865 in Revision 1.86 of
> > org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractDOMParser as shown below should fix the
> problem.
> >
> > public void xmlDecl(String version, String encoding, String standalone,
> >                         Augmentations augs)
> >         throws XNIException {
> >         if (!fDeferNodeExpansion) {
> >             // REVISIT: when DOM Level 3 is REC rely on Document.support
> >             //          instead of specific class
> >             if (fDocumentImpl != null) {
> >                 fDocumentImpl.setVersion(version);
> >                 fDocumentImpl.setEncoding(encoding);
> > -               fDocumentImpl.setStandalone("true".equals(standalone));
> > +               fDocumentImpl.setStandalone("yes".equals(standalone));
> >             }
> >         }
> >         else {
> >             fDeferredDocumentImpl.setVersion(version);
> >             fDeferredDocumentImpl.setEncoding(encoding);
> > -
> fDeferredDocumentImpl.setStandalone("true".equals(standalone));
> > +           fDeferredDocumentImpl.setStandalone("yes".equals(standalone));
> >         }
> >     } // xmlDecl(String,String,String)
> >
> > -----------------------------
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 4B Computer Engineering
> > University of Waterloo
> >
> > On Sun, 11 May 2003, Pae Choi wrote:
> >
> > > When I try to get the "standalone" attribute value from the DOM after
> loading
> > > the XML document from a file it *always* returns "false."
> > >
> > > I have a demo XML file containing two lines as:
> > >
> > > // ################ XML File ##################
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
> > > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/>
> > >
> > > And the code snippet is as follows:
> > >
> > > // ################ CODE SNIPPET ##################
> > > private void checkXMLDecl() {
> > >         // Create a factory object for creating DOM parsers
> > >         DocumentBuilderFactory  factory =
> DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
> > >         DocumentBuilder         builder = null;
> > >         Document                 xmlDOM = null;
> > >
> > >         try {
> > >             // Now use the factory to create a DOM parser
> > >             builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
> > >             xsDOM = builder.parse(xsdFile);
> > >
> > >             // Get the xml declaration
> > >             System.out.println("version = [" +
> ((CoreDocumentImpl)xsDOM).getVersion() + "]");
> > >             System.out.println("encoding = [" +
> ((CoreDocumentImpl)xsDOM).getEncoding() + "]");
> > >             // ########################################################
> > >             // The getStandalone() method does NOT work
> > >             if ( ((CoreDocumentImpl)xsDOM).getStandalone() )
> > >                 System.out.println("standalone is true");
> > >             else
> > >                 System.out.println("standalone is false");
> > >         }
> > >         catch (Exception ex) {
> > >         }
> > > }
> > >
> > > I have tested with Xerces v2.0.2, v2.2.1, and v2.4.0, but all three
> returns
> > > the same result, "false."
> > >
> > > Any comments?
> > >
> > >
> > > Pae
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to