I was afraid of that.  I really need to it to be a key because I have a
keyref for that as well in the real document.  Any chance I can help get
this fixed reasonable quickly, since I have an application that needs this
functionality?

Neil Graham writes:
 > 
 > Hi John,
 > 
 > That's a bug.  Please file a report in bugzilla, attaching these
 > schema/instance documents.
 > 
 > If all you want to assert is really that "all guids must be unique", then
 > there is a workaround:  replace your selector's xpath with .//*.  This
 > produces the correct result on this file anyway.
 > 
 > Hope that helps,
 > Neil
 > Neil Graham
 > XML Parser Development
 > IBM Toronto Lab
 > Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
 > E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >                                                                              
 >                                                           
 >                       Jon Schewe                                             
 >                                                           
 >                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 >                                                 
 >                       well.com>                cc:                           
 >                                                           
 >                                                Subject:  problem with keys   
 >                                                           
 >                       11/07/2003 05:00                                       
 >                                                           
 >                       PM                                                     
 >                                                           
 >                       Please respond to                                      
 >                                                           
 >                       xerces-j-user                                          
 >                                                           
 >                                                                              
 >                                                           
 >                                                                              
 >                                                           
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > I'm rather stuck here and am wondering if I'm trying to do something
 > invalid or what.  This schema and instance document validate with xsv, but
 > not with Xerces (2.5.0).  Attached are the instance and schema documents.
 > I'm
 > using the xerces sample dom.GetElementsByTagName with arguments -v -s.  The
 > problem appears to be that xerces doesn't like it when the selector
 > of a key contains a parent element and it's child, like so: <xs:selector
 > xpath="./dome:Model|./dome:Model/dome:Entity"/>
 > 
 > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 > 
 > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
 >            targetNamespace="http://dome.honeywell.com";
 >            xmlns="http://dome.honeywell.com";
 >                 xmlns:dome="http://dome.honeywell.com";
 >            elementFormDefault="qualified" >
 > 
 >   <xs:element name="DOME">
 >     <xs:complexType>
 >       <xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 >         <xs:element name="Model" type="ModelType"/>
 >      </xs:sequence>
 >     </xs:complexType>
 >     <xs:key name="PK">
 >       <xs:annotation>
 >         <xs:documentation>
 >           All guids must be unique within this file
 >         </xs:documentation>
 >       </xs:annotation>
 >       <xs:selector xpath="./dome:Model|./dome:Model/dome:Entity"/>
 >       <xs:field xpath="@guid"/>
 >     </xs:key>
 >   </xs:element>
 > 
 >   <xs:simpleType name="guidType">
 >     <xs:restriction base="xs:string"/>
 >   </xs:simpleType>
 > 
 >   <xs:complexType name="UniqueObjectType">
 >     <xs:attribute name="guid" type="guidType" use="required"/>
 >   </xs:complexType>
 > 
 >   <xs:complexType name="EntityType">
 >     <xs:complexContent>
 >       <xs:extension base="UniqueObjectType" />
 >     </xs:complexContent>
 >   </xs:complexType>
 > 
 >   <xs:complexType name="ModelType">
 >     <xs:complexContent>
 >       <xs:extension base="UniqueObjectType">
 >         <xs:sequence>
 >           <xs:element name="Entity" type="EntityType" minOccurs="0"
 > maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
 >         </xs:sequence>
 >       </xs:extension>
 >     </xs:complexContent>
 >   </xs:complexType>
 > 
 > </xs:schema>
 > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 > <DOME xmlns="http://dome.honeywell.com";
 >              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
 >              xsi:schemaLocation="http://dome.honeywell.com test.xsd">
 >   <Model guid="1">
 >     <Entity guid="1"/>
 >   </Model>
 > </DOME>
 > 
 > 
 > --
 > Your mouse has moved.
 > Windows must restart for change to take effect.
 > Reboot now? [OK]
 > *My views may not represent those of my employers
 > 
 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Your mouse has moved. 
Windows must restart for change to take effect.
Reboot now? [OK]
*My views may not represent those of my employers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to