Hi, I am using Xerces in Jena to process RDF as I describe below. I have encountered a problem when using anySimpleType. I have asked the xml-schema working group to comment if this is legal, but not received a reply - can anybody here comment?
thanks in advance, Mark Butler > --------- > Dear xml-schema colleagues, > > I maintain an API for processing UAProf, an Open Mobile Alliance standard which uses RDF. One of the major changes with UAProf V2.0 [1] is it adopts the XML Schema based approach for RDF datatyping proposed in the recent RDF-core Working Draft [2]. However when I try to process the XML Schema [3] produced by the UAProf drafting committee XML Schema tools report errors as the schema uses anySimpleType. > > Please can you tell me whether using anySimpleType in this way is legal? Despite reviewing the specs and your issue list, I am afraid I am still confused? I suspect that E1-22 [4] in the errata for XML Schema is intended to clarify this but I'm afraid the decision is not clear to me? I note Jane Hunter [5] has also asked the same question, although in a different context, so perhaps you can point me to your reply? > > thanks in advance, kind regards > [1] http://www.openmobilealliance.org/documents/OMA-UAProf-v2_0-20030520-C1.zip > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/ > [3] http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/profiles/uaprof/xmlschema-20030226 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0091 > > Dr Mark H. Butler > Research Scientist HP Labs Bristol > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/marbut/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
