I still need some clarification/assistance, please. I'm a *casual* user of xerces. I'm trying to do a simple validation of a bunch of files with xhtml-strict.xsd, and xerces 2.6.2 spews a couple errors on the regexps for each file. Is there a patch to the xhtml-strict.xsd file? Or is there a patch to the xerces 2.6.2 release? What is the simplest approach to getting around this issue?

Thanks.

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:36:20 -0700, Bob Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Well, it's time to unimplement it. I've been informed by Steve Sperberg-McQueen that a portion of that errata resolution has been rewritten so as to allow the usage in xhtml1-strict (and many other published schemas).

Bob Foster

Michael Glavassevich wrote:

Hello Michael,

This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular version of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+] in the value of a pattern facet.

Thanks.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:


I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to