------------------------------------
Hmm. XercesJ reports three errors (not warnings) from this schema of the form:
Error - src-resolve: Cannot resolve the name 'unknownX' to a(n) 'type definition' component.
Where X is one of: 1, 2, 3;
Bob Foster
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > I'll answer a simple question which I understand, and which I _think_ > is what you're asking. > > The following XML document is valid: > > <!DOCTYPE root [ > <!ELEMENT root (a|x)> > <!ELEMENT a (b|y)> > <!ELEMENT b (c|z)> > <!ELEMENT c EMPTY> > ]> > <root><a><b><c/></b></a></root> > > Note it contains no declarations for the elements x, y and z. > > The corresponding schema document successfully validates the same > instance: > [Example unquoted so you can try it yourself]
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:element name="root"> <xs:complexType> <xs:choice> <xs:element ref="a"/> <xs:element ref="x"/> </xs:choice> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
<xs:element name="a"> <xs:complexType> <xs:choice> <xs:element ref="b"/> <xs:element ref="y"/> </xs:choice> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
<xs:element name="b"> <xs:complexType> <xs:choice> <xs:element ref="c"/> <xs:element ref="z"/> </xs:choice> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
<xs:element name="c"> <xs:complexType/> </xs:element>
<xs:element name="x" type="unknown1"/> <xs:element name="y" type="unknown2"/> <xs:element name="z" type="unknown3"/> </xs:schema>
> > So yes, you can do incremental development of a schema for a complex > XML language. > > ht
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]