Jason, sorry just getting back to you. My email server was down this weekend:-(
Let me get it together in the next few minutes and I'll send. I actually have a Makefile for the 1.5.* modulde which reflect the Makefile for the 1.3 as well as a few other minor changes. Would you rather me send that one? Can you give me the contact info for the person trying to port. Maybe we can somehow keep the communication channel going if I have comments or some time to help out. Is it Mark Riehl by any chance? Ilya -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sterin, Ilya Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Sent: 10/26/01 7:45 PM Subject: Re: XML::Xerces port to windows "Sterin, Ilya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Definitelly Perl needs Xerces right now, probably more than any other XML > module, due to it's schema support progress, and having compatibility with > most platforms is very important. Windows is really important in my > opinion, though I never run production apps on windows, it's a good platform > (and a standard one, if you work for a large corporation) to do development > before rolling to a *NIX server. I've had 137 downloads for the last 13 > days. But 1.3 does not have schema support, so I can imagine that this will > be very highly used on windows, since it's the only perl module that has > such schema support. Ilya, Could you send the Makefile.PL you used to compile 1.3 to the list? There is someone working on porting 1.5.7 (which does have schema support) and he is running into trouble. Your input would be much appreciated. Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
