On Tue, 2001-10-30 at 02:14, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > In principle I agree. The difference here is that the relationship of > Xerces-C to XML::Xerces is not just a simple dependancy, it's a matter > of two sister projects.
Not from where I'm sitting. From here it's just a simple dependancy. You may also wish to consider just how much pain you're willing to inflict on yourself in getting the version numbers to make sense. :-) > Having a related version numbering scheme really helps. Why? > > BTW, am I the only one getting messages in triplicate from this list > > nowadays? > > I'm not. Anyone else? ISTR someone mention duplicates were a GNU Mailman bug? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
