"Steven N. Hirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you had any success building XML-Xerces against the IBM XML4C > releases? It looks like the current one is based on Xerces 2.2.0. I made > a quick stab at building against it, but ran into trouble with > > %ITERATORS > %OWNER > and > @ISA > > being undefined in Xerces.pm, although it linked fine (I built xml4c > without namespaces!).
No idea, I've never tried it. I believe you will *have* to compile with namespaces *enabled* to make it work. Do keep me posted, and I'll give whatever help I can. > Our IP attorneys would greatly prefer us to use xml4c instead of Xerces-C > to avoid any question of code ownership. Funny - same people build both code bases... But that's how lawyers make their money. jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
