Jason E. Stewart wrote:

>> But now I see new ones, further down in Xerces.cpp - I guess I'll
>> give it up for the moment.


> Ah, let me know what these are. Your strategy of putting #undef's in > Xerces.cpp is the correct one.


No, there aren't any more errors. Somehow I had managed to insert some erratic linebreaks into xerces.cpp which broke it.


So - if you adapt 2.4.0 to the current Xerces-C API and fix the _p_void issue, I'd be happy ...

Martin



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to