xesam  

Messages by Date

• 2023/12/11 Re: Confused about xesam:asText Arun Raghavan
• 2023/12/10 Confused about xesam:asText 北雁 Cryolitia
• 2011/02/23 Re: [Xesam] Websites that need updating Sebastian Trüg
• 2010/11/21 [Xesam] comparison of Nepomuk (the EU project) and Gnowsis - blogpost Leo Sauermann
• 2010/11/08 Re: [Xesam] Websites that need updating Robin Green
• 2010/11/07 [Xesam] Websites that need updating Robin Green
• 2010/09/19 [Xesam] New SDO bug database and the first entry Sebastian Trueg
• 2010/05/27 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
• 2010/05/27 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Roberto Guido
• 2010/05/27 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Leo Sauermann
• 2010/05/25 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Ivan Frade
• 2010/05/21 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
• 2010/05/21 Re: [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Ivan Frade
• 2010/05/20 [Xesam] Missing classes: Notes and Feeds Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
• 2010/05/11 Re: [Xesam] nmm:MusicPiece vs nfo:Audio Ivan Frade
• 2010/05/10 [Xesam] nmm:MusicPiece vs nfo:Audio Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
• 2010/03/16 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] positive feedback about NEPOMUK & KDE 4.4 - and KOffice has RDF Leo Sauermann
• 2010/03/14 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] positive feedback about NEPOMUK & KDE 4.4 - you rock Jos van den Oever
• 2010/03/13 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] positive feedback about NEPOMUK & KDE 4.4 - you rock Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2010/03/09 [Xesam] positive feedback about NEPOMUK & KDE 4.4 - you rock Leo Sauermann
• 2010/02/22 Re: [Xesam] xesam.org ? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2010/02/22 [Xesam] xesam.org ? sjeanjean.ext
• 2010/01/29 Re: [Xesam] NUAO Leo Sauermann
• 2010/01/25 [Xesam] NUAO Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/12/21 Re: [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Leo Sauermann
• 2009/12/14 Re: [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/12/14 Re: [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/12/11 Re: [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Ivan Frade
• 2009/12/11 Re: [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Roberto Guido
• 2009/12/11 [Xesam] nuao user action ontology Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/27 Re: [Xesam] we agree on proposal to work towards "one patch per ticket" - DONE. Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/27 Re: [Xesam] Shared-desktop-ontologies 0.1 released Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/25 Re: [Xesam] Shared-desktop-ontologies 0.1 released Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/11/25 [Xesam] Shared-desktop-ontologies 0.1 released Sebastian Trueg
• 2009/11/24 Re: [Xesam] [Oscaf] First shared-desktop-ontologies tarball test Sebastian Trueg
• 2009/11/24 Re: [Xesam] [Oscaf] First shared-desktop-ontologies tarball test Sebastian Trueg
• 2009/11/24 Re: [Xesam] [Oscaf] First shared-desktop-ontologies tarball test Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/11/24 Re: [Xesam] [Oscaf] First shared-desktop-ontologies tarball test Ivan Frade
• 2009/11/24 Re: [Xesam] [Oscaf] First shared-desktop-ontologies tarball test Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/23 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/11/23 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Sebastian Trueg
• 2009/11/20 Re: [Xesam] Notifications Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/20 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/19 Re: [Xesam] Notifications Roberto Guido
• 2009/11/19 [Xesam] Notifications Antoni Mylka
• 2009/11/19 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Antoni Mylka
• 2009/11/18 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Sebastian Faubel
• 2009/11/17 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/11/17 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/11/17 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Antoni Mylka
• 2009/11/17 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Roberto Guido
• 2009/11/17 Re: [Xesam] NRL; Need your input - Leo proposes to allow from now on only "one patch per ticket" because we are slow and discussion is endless Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/10 Re: [Xesam] Base ontologies converted to trig -> please verify Sebastian Trueg
• 2009/11/10 [Xesam] upcoming push of release to /ontologies on different server Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/10 Re: [Xesam] Base ontologies converted to trig -> please verify Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/10 [Xesam] Base ontologies converted to trig -> please verify Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/11/10 Re: [Xesam] oscaf ontologies: new ontology NSO, moved ontologies to individual pages, maintainers - please get sf accounts Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/11/09 Re: [Xesam] oscaf ontologies: new ontology NSO, moved ontologies to individual pages, maintainers - please get sf accounts Roberto Guido
• 2009/11/08 [Xesam] oscaf ontologies: new ontology NSO, moved ontologies to individual pages, maintainers - please get sf accounts Leo Sauermann
• 2009/11/01 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Tomás Vírseda
• 2009/10/28 Re: [Xesam] Oscaf ticket to discuss Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/10/28 Re: [Xesam] Oscaf ticket to discuss Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/10/28 [Xesam] Oscaf ticket to discuss Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/10/05 [Xesam] One more update on the Nepomuk Workshop II Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/09/29 [Xesam] Update on the Nepomuk Workshop II Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/09/28 [Xesam] OpenSocialSemanticDesktopWorkshop2009 - can we decide the date 6.11-9.11.2009 now for booking? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/28 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/26 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Ivan Frade
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] active PIMO documents were in legacy, copied them into trunk again. Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] [people] pimo:Tag vs nao:Tag Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/25 [Xesam] active PIMO documents were in legacy, copied them into trunk again. Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/25 Re: [Xesam] searching for responsible maintainer for NCO Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/09/22 [Xesam] searching for responsible maintainer for NCO Leo Sauermann
• 2009/09/17 [Xesam] Nepomuk Workshop 2 - The Open Social Semantic Desktop Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/08/26 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/08/19 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/08/19 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Leo Sauermann
• 2009/08/18 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Antoni Mylka
• 2009/08/18 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
• 2009/08/18 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Ivan Frade
• 2009/08/18 Re: [Xesam] Decision making process Philip Van Hoof
• 2009/08/18 [Xesam] Decision making process Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/08/16 Re: [Xesam] saying something about xesam/kde/nepomuk/oscaf standardization to get a good wikipedia paragraph on what we did Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/08/11 Re: [Xesam] OSCAF ontologies folder for publishing Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/08/11 [Xesam] OSCAF ontologies folder for publishing Leo Sauermann
• 2009/08/05 [Xesam] Bugs ontology and bugtracker output as RDF Olivier Berger
• 2009/08/03 [Xesam] saying something about xesam/kde/nepomuk/oscaf standardization to get a good wikipedia paragraph on what we did Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/29 Re: [Xesam] Validator Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/27 Re: [Xesam] Validator Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/26 [Xesam] Validator Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/26 [Xesam] roberto, can you look at ticket:38? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/25 Re: [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Initiative Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/25 [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Support for MIME entities and email Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/25 Re: [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Initiative Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/24 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview - RTFM the overview first? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/24 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Philip Van Hoof
• 2009/07/24 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/24 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Philip Van Hoof
• 2009/07/24 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Initiative Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Rewriting the build tools Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Request for an overview Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/23 [Xesam] Request for an overview Philip Van Hoof
• 2009/07/23 [Xesam] Request for an overview Philip Van Hoof
• 2009/07/23 [Xesam] oscaf.sf.net redirects to our trac Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/23 Re: [Xesam] Rewriting the build tools Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/22 Re: [Xesam] Rewriting the build tools Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/22 Re: [Xesam] Rewriting the build tools Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/22 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/21 [Xesam] Rewriting the build tools Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/21 Re: [Xesam] Tickets assigned to AntoniMylka Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/21 Re: [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Initiative Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/21 Re: [Xesam] Tickets assigned to AntoniMylka Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/20 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/20 Re: [Xesam] Tickets assigned to AntoniMylka Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/20 [Xesam] [Ticket-a-day] Initiative Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/07/20 [Xesam] Tickets assigned to AntoniMylka Antoni Mylka
• 2009/07/18 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/17 Re: [Xesam] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/17 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/16 Re: [Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Sebastian Kügler
• 2009/07/13 Re: [Xesam] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/13 [Xesam] Nepomuk/Desktop/Shared ontologies - svn layout as discussed at the GCDS last week Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/07 Re: [Xesam] tracker's modifications on nepomuk ontologies Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/07 Re: [Xesam] Who is going to GCDS? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/04 Re: [Xesam] Who is going to GCDS? Arun Raghavan
• 2009/07/03 Re: [Xesam] nepomuk tickets migration Leo Sauermann
• 2009/07/02 Re: [Xesam] Who is going to GCDS? Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/02 Re: [Xesam] Who is going to GCDS? Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/02 [Xesam] Who is going to GCDS? Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Ivan Frade
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/07/01 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Ivan Frade
• 2009/06/30 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/30 [Xesam] Alive again Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/30 Re: [Xesam] packaging problem Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/30 [Xesam] packaging problem Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/29 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/29 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Ivan Frade
• 2009/06/29 Re: [Xesam] tracker's modifications on nepomuk ontologies Ivan Frade
• 2009/06/29 [Xesam] tracker's modifications on nepomuk ontologies Roberto Guido
• 2009/06/29 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/29 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/28 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/27 Re: [Xesam] nepomuk tickets migration Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/26 Re: [Xesam] nepomuk tickets migration Roberto Guido
• 2009/06/26 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/26 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/26 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/26 Re: [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Ivan Frade
• 2009/06/26 [Xesam] Desktop ontology svn layout Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/25 Re: [Xesam] nepomuk tickets migration Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/25 [Xesam] nepomuk tickets migration Roberto Guido
• 2009/06/20 [Xesam] moved nepomuk ontologies to OSCAF repository Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/20 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/18 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Roberto Guido
• 2009/06/18 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/18 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Roberto Guido
• 2009/06/17 [Xesam] oscaf: "change - yes we can" Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/17 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/16 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Urho Konttori
• 2009/06/16 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/16 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/16 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Antoni Mylka
• 2009/06/16 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Urho Konttori
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Sebastian Trüg
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] dumping NID3/NEXIF for NMM Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Urho Konttori
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/15 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Leo Sauermann
• 2009/06/12 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/11 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Evgeny Egorochkin
• 2009/06/11 Re: [Xesam] oscaf/xesam ontology merge: who is going to maintain/edit what? Antoni Mylka

• Earlier messages