On 26/09/2010 20:40, Will Robertson wrote:
On 2010-09-27 02:14:03 +0930, Drébon <[email protected]> said:
\usepackage{pxfonts}
\usepackage{txfonts}
\usepackage[osf,sc]{mathpazo}
You just changed the math/text font three times...
Oh... indeed...
So I guess in I should only have that kind of preamble :
\usepackage[osf,sc]{mathpazo}
\usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm} %for math text
\usepackage{helvet} %for sans serif text
If you're only using UTF8 for Latin input text, you can use pdfLaTeX with
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
Well, this was not the aim... Actually in my preamble I have macro
definition that take place before anything... And that user may change
so that it contains anykind of unicode character... By just using
[utf8]{inputenc} latex processes those definition in iso-8859-1. So it
forces me to have two encoding in the same document (of course not the
same file).
But if you insist on using XeLaTeX, you should probably go the whole
hog and load a Unicode font. Try TeX Gyre Pagella as a replacement for
mathpazo as your text font. Something like
\setmainfont[
Extension=.otf,
UprightFont=*-regular,
ItalicFont=*-italic,
BoldFont=*-bold,
BoldItalicFont=*-bolditalic,
]{texgyrepagella}
If I am not wrong, this does only redefine the text font and not the
math font isn't it ?
Thank you very much for your answer.
--
Best wishes, D.
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
