Hi Enrico,
On 22/06/2011, at 8:23 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> I tried with AR 9.4.5 on Mac OS X 10.5; I get the number, when copying and
> pasting,
> as advertised by the package. The only problem is that in some cases not all
> the Roman
> number gets selected, but copying gives the whole thing.
OK. I'll have a detailed look at what the PDF coding looks like.
Can you send me your PDF please.
>
> Other viewers don't understand this, as expected. I still feel that it's
> quite useless:
> if I find "Louis XIV" I may want to copy it and get the real name, not "Louis
> 14".
Sure.
It is your job as author to decide what your readers should get.
If you want them to get "Louis XIV" then no /ActualText is required.
*unless* that X I and V are really: U+2169 U+2160 U+2164 .
In that case you may want the /ActualText to replace with "XIV" so that
your readers don't end up with the undefined character symbol.
Or maybe you want them to get "Louis quatorze".
Probably you do want a screen reader to say "Louis quatorze",
but then you'll want to test that AR reads it correctly
--- maybe /Alt(Louie katorze) will be better.
This kind of stuff adds a whole new dimension to typesetting.
>
> Ciao
> Enrico
Have fun.
Ross
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Moore [email protected]
Mathematics Department office: E7A-419
Macquarie University tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955
Sydney, Australia 2109 fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
