Quoting Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) ([email protected]):
>
>
> Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> >Yes, maybe it has to be
> >
> > \def\char\n{\Cher\char\n}
>
> Simplest is to grab the original meaning of \n before
> re-defining it :
>
> \let \canonicaln = \n
> \def \n {whatever, using \canonicaln}
That's not Peter's intention, Phil. If I understand correctly, he wants to
construct a loop, where \n contains the loop's counter (and the integer
representation of the character to be replaced, if I understand correctly),
so he does not want to define \n, but define whatever \n contains. I am
still too confused by \expandafter's and \csname's to implement that
myself...
Hope that helps,
Susan
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
