Thank you Andy and Peter for your feedback. I did try including Andy's
suggested code in the preamble and
{\begin{textipaeEnvironment} TA@2"DENSU \end{textipaeEnvironment}} in
the document.
But I was told that textipaEnvironment is undefined. With an error
message like that, it is quite possible that I did something wrong.But I think at this point, I would like to pursue the TECkit map solution. At least in my mind (and maybe in my mind only) it could lead to a possibly more "elegant" solution...and it would probably be easier for me to maintain (since in part I am not really a Tex programmer). Thank you again, Dan On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Peter Dyballa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 24.10.2011 um 00:57 schrieb Daniel Greenhoe: > >> I am talking about these for example ... >> T ==> theta ('124) >> A ==> script A ('101) >> @ ==> schwa ('100) >> 2 ==> turned V ('062) >> D ==> Eth ('104) >> E ==> epsilon ('105) >> N ==> right-tail n ('357) >> S ==> Esh ('123) >> U ==> upsilon ('125) >> " ==> vertical stroke superior ('042) > > Something like this mapping can be achieved. Normal text could be set with an > "unmodified" version of GNU Freefont, while you could create \textipa{} as > using the same font with the ASCII2tipa mapping. So your document would use > kind of two fonts. A "textipaEnvironment" seems not useful. When inside it > only IPA characters would be used you could switch to the mapped font, when > normal and mapped characters are used there is no means to distinguish > between them, so you would need to use \textipa{}. > > -- > Greetings > > Pete > > Well begun is half done. > – Optimist. > Half done is well begun. > – Realist. > Half begun is well done. > – Australian. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
