On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > I think (with respect) that "some Unicode code points outside the 7-bit range" > is a gross understatement. As far as I am aware, XeTeX permits a very > considerable > subset of Unicode (perhaps even all of it; I do not know) as input.
My point is that it shouldn't treat U+00A0 as equivalent to U+007E, or as valid at all, just because it supports "Unicode." That is not what supporting Unicode means. -- Matthew Skala [email protected] People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
