2012/2/18 <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Jonathan Kew wrote: >> If you're in a position to edit the font such that it has a 1000-unit em >> square, this may resolve the incompatibility. > > It *is* a font with a non-1000-unit em, so that's probably the issue and > editing the font is probably the right solution. It bothers me, because > non-1000 values ought to be supported, but even if I and this one user can > change our software, I need the font (which I'm designing) to work for > other users both generating and viewing documents, and I can't expect the > whole world to change software versions when there's a large installed > base of viewers and XeTeX versions that don't work with non-1000 values. > -- I got similar problem with non-1000 em Devanagari font. It was displayed properly in AR in Linux but was printed overlapped and in wrong size. Ghostscript was not able to display PDF with such a font and issued a fatal error. AR in Windows displayed the PDF with overlapping characters. MS Word (probably 2003) in Windows 7 was able to read this PDF and print it properly although the font was not installed in that Windows machine, Word took it from the PDF file.
> Matthew Skala > [email protected] People before principles. > http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
