On 10/15/12 10:59 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
That's exactly the problem - these glyphs are encoded at PUA
codepoints, so that's what (most) tools will give you as the
corresponding character data. If they were unencoded, (some) tools
would use the glyph names to infer the relevant characters, which
would work better.
Small caps are named like "a.sc" and they are unencoded.
And as they're unencoded, (some) tools will look at the glyph name and
map it to the appropriate character.
I've been trying to explain this: but Jonathan does it much better than
I did, and with more authority.
P.
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex