2012/12/19 Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]>: > > > Herbert Schulz wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Hmmm... I thought the original poster was using xelatex? > > Yes, he was. But not being a LaTeX user, I like to know what > I can achieve in plain XeTeX, and if "Ligatures=TeX" were > not a feature of Fontspec but intrinsic in the engine, then > I too would be able to use "the more ``modern' way of doing this". > Modern does not necessarily mean better. For instance, I have a large collection of commercial fonts where f+i do not automatically form the fi ligature although the fi glyph exists in the font. With Mapping=somethig I know how to build the map file that contains an additional rule f+i->fi. I do not know how to do it with the Ligatures keyword.
> ** Phil. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
