This looks very bad! It weren't like that last time I tested vertical layout (which was fairly recently), I'll see what got broken.
Regards, Khaled On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:52:30PM +0900, Dohyun Kim wrote: > Attached is my tex file for test. "Adobe Myungjo Std" used in this > file is a font bundled with Korean version of Adobe Reader. If you do > not have this font, replace it with any other cjk font which has vrt2 > feature, such as Kozuka Mincho. > > Best, > > > 2013/3/28 Khaled Hosny <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:29:35AM +0900, Dohyun Kim wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> "vertical" option of XeTeX 0.9999 is currently broken. Applying > >> attached patch seems to make it work better, though I know almost > >> nothing about C language. > > > > I appreaciate if you have test files for me to try, I had hard time > > figuring how to test this since most CJK fonts that I have give funny > > results even with old XeTeX. > > > > Regards, > > > >> Still, some issue remains. Especially vertical gpos feature, for > >> instance +vhal option, does not work correctly. Though vhal feature > >> should decrease the glyph advance, current XeTeX increases it instead. > >> Harfbuzz, on the other hand, works correctly. I could not figure out > >> where this problem comes from. > > > > Tests for this are welcome, too. > > > > Regards, > > Khaled > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > > > -- > Dohyun Kim > College of Law, Dongguk University > Seoul, Republic of Korea > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
