> Well, you could try to run tftopl, a convertor from TFM to an easier readable
> (TeX) Property List file. You could also look into the AFM (Adobe Font
> Metrics) file (or the AFT file, whatever it is). Then you'll see the clear
> names of the font's glyphs and their encoding.
Except that's irrelevant, as you seem to be saying yourself at the end
of your email: TeX's font encodings are simply different things from
character encodings such as Unicode and other standards such as ISO 8859,
ISCII, Windows' code pages, Shift-JIS, etc.
And I'm not even sure what you're aiming at in your last paragraph.
Indeed,
> There is no connection from the manifold of font encodings TeX uses to
> Unicode. If you'll find some, it might just be
... that you're calling an apple an orange.
Arthur
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
