Dne úterý, 17. září 2013, Peter Dyballa napsal(a): > > Am 17.09.2013 um 19:56 schrieb Herbert Schulz: > > > Both pdflatex and xelatex (actually xdvipdfmx) can convert eps->pdf on > the fly in recent TeX Live (and other I suppose) distributions. Pdflatex, > with the graphicx package, uses a restricted version of epstopdf to convert > file.eps->file-eps-converted-to.pdf and includes that file while xdvipdfmx > does the conversion in a tmp directory. > > Exactly! The problem is that this is not controlled by the user and might > degrade original quality. And this can happen twice when a tool tries to > convert the PDF format into another one. Particularly then when one tries > to use the same set of images for different purposes it's worth to spend a > few thoughts on their formats and how to achieve them.
That's true. I prefer to write a makefile and convert the eps files outside TeX. For the sam reason I would not use PDF to HTML conversion. Well written latex file contains a structure and EPUB should also have a structure. It is not easy to reconstruct the structure from mere font changes in PDF. This is the very reason why I have not tried such tools at all. > > -- > Greetings > > Pete > > Bake pizza not war! > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > -- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
