On 28/05/2014 16:14, Akira Kakuto wrote: > Dear Vafa Karen-Pahlav > >> w.eps is taken from LaTeX graphics companion examples; >> therefore I do not think there is anything wrong with the image itself. >> >> What is wrong? > > It is sufficient to change the header of w.eps > from > %!PS-Adobe-2.0 > to > %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0 > in order to tell Ghostscript that w.eps is an > eps file. > > Please try, then you will obtain an expected pdf. > > Thanks, > Akira
All true, but both latex + dvips and pdflatex produce the expected output, as do latex + dvipdfmx or xelatex with the older driver set up. -- Joseph Wright -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
