Am Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:09:08 +0100 schrieb Stefan Müller: >> Well, it is a bit early to claim a xetex bug. You are using a quite >> complicated package which beside others loads specific drivers for >> xetex (xetex.def, pgfsys-xetex.def, pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def).
> OK. Thanks! So, what can I do? Minimize the example. I certainly don't want to wander through a large forest tree to track down an error. It must be possible to remove quite a large part of your example. > I thought that this shows that there > must be something wrong with xelatex. And which part of xelatex? The tikz code? The graphicx code? The xetex binary? xdvipdfmx? -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
