> Fair enough. My thought was simply that if a sufficiently large number
> of users are dependent (even tacitly) on the current behaviour, then
> opting-in to the new should not be out of the question ...
That's the eternal question, isn't it - to which extend should a buggy
behaviour be preserved for backward compatibility? In this case I'm
rather glad that Khaled didn't hesitate to break said compatibility.
Arthur
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
