On 24 Feb 2016, at 2:20 AM, Jonathan Kew <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> For a document that wants some other kind of "ActualText", there's going to
> need to be pretty detailed markup in the source, I think. (E.g. each word, or
> similar unit, will need to be tagged to provide the desired ActualText that
> goes with it.) At that point, I wonder if turning off
> \XeTeXgenerateactualtext and just doing it "manually" with macros that
> generate \special{}s would be the most reasonable way forward.
This sounds interesting for maths, where there is a chance we could
automatically insert \special{}s at the glyph and/or the equation level — has
this always been possible in XeTeX or does this require the newest patch for
xdvipdfmx you just released?
Cheers,
Will
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
