On 27 March 2017 at 19:37, jfbu <j...@free.fr> wrote: > .. ah, I don't think I'd noticed xetex was using _quite_ so many digits in its version number:-) as you say the test is a bit suspect but it works in the one case it needs to work so D guess it's OK!
David -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex