On 27 March 2017 at 19:37, jfbu <j...@free.fr> wrote:
> ..

ah, I don't think I'd noticed xetex was using _quite_ so many digits
in its version number:-)
as you say the test is a bit suspect but it works in the one case it
needs to work so D guess it's OK!

David


--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to