Thanks, Wilfred. I will look into this. Best wishes, Arash
On 17 March 2018 at 11:00, Wilfred van Rooijen <[email protected]> wrote: > If your bugfix is simple and without other (potential) side effects, then > you can make a new version of the package incorporating your changes. Add a > description of your changes to the source code, add a contact address, and > make this new version available for everybody. Then upload the package to > CTAN. That last step is the problem - I also don't know how to upload a > package so that it is "registered" in CTAN. Perhaps someone else on this > list can provide some more info. > > Wilfred > > > > On Saturday, March 17, 2018 4:25 AM, Arash Zeini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I don't have the necessary skills to maintain the code and I was not the > one who came up with the modifications. I'd be more than happy to take care > of the administrative side of things, if that's possible. > > Best, > Arash > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, 12:54 Wilfred van Rooijen, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > You should "adopt" the package and become the new maintainer, perhaps. > > Wilfred > > > > On Friday, March 16, 2018 7:33 PM, Arash Zeini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > A couple of years ago, I raised an issue I had encountered with the arcs > package (see below for the complete run of messages). A solution was > proposed by Michael Sharpe and Joseph Wright wrote that he would mention > the issue on c.t.t., as messages to arcs' author bounced. The solution, > which I add manually to arcs.sty is: > > "The arcs package depends on the relsize package which did change a few > months ago in a way that requires a small change in the arcs package. You > need to add the line (just after \RequirePackage{relsize} is a good place} > > \long\def \@gobblethree #1#2#3{} > > and then change the line > > \let \rs@size@warning = \@gobbletwo > > to > > \let \rs@size@warning = \@gobblethree > > because, in relsize.sty, the macro \rs@size@warning is now defined to > have three arguments, the last of which (6.0pt) was being left as printable > text. This problem is a LaTeX issue and has nothing particular to XeTeX." > > The arcs package was never updated and the issue persists. Is there anyway > these changes could be incorporated into arcs.sty? I use arcs quite often > and it would be a great help if the changes could become part of the code. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Arash > > On 26 August 2013 at 17:25, Arash Zeini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you, all, for your feedback. I can wait for the fix to be applied. > > Joseph: if you hear anything, could you please post it here? > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Arash > > > On 25 August 2013 16:02, Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@morningstar2. co.uk > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 25/08/2013 16:00, Joseph Wright wrote: > > Nothing to do with XeTeX: it's due to relsize and shows up with a demo > > for pdfTeX. Inside arcs.sty you find > > > > \let \rs@size@warning = \@gobbletwo > > \relsize{-10}% > > > > but in the latest relsize (dated 2013-03-29) \rs@size@warning takes > > three arguments. Thus arcs needs adjusting (probaly should just leave > > the relsize code alone): I've CC'd the arcs author. > > Message to the arcs author bounced. I'll raise this on c.t.t.: the > package is LPPL so a change can be sorted out if he can't be found. > -- > Joseph Wright > > > ------------------------------ -------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/ listinfo/xetex > <http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > > >
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
