https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217
--- Comment #32 from Guido Berhoerster <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jarno Suni from comment #28) > Created attachment 5682 [details] > Not using pidof to detect which screensaver is running, as adviced in > comment 19. Does not add support for mate-screensaver and > cinnamon-screensaver, yet, because I can't test it. > > In case xfconf implementation will not finish soon, I did try to fix xflock4. The thing is that xflock4 is not fixable, it's a hack that's broken by design and needs to go away. (In reply to Jarno Suni from comment #29) > (In reply to Eric Koegel from comment #20) > > You're right (as always). pgrep might be a better tool than pidof, > > availability-wise. > > Maybe, and how is pgrep multiuser-wise? No, for non-cooperating screensavers (i.e. which provide a cli tool like xscreensaver) it is impossible to reliably implement such a check, particularly cross-platform. Instead of adding hack upon hack for obscure lockers that two people actually use, this should to be turned into a setting. So if you want to help out, you could start turning the locking command into a xfconf setting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Xfce-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
