Christoph, > > So IMHO better remove all XULRunner related stuff. :p > > > > To be honest, I don't know anybody that still prefers Firefox over > > Chromium. > > I do. As soon as you have a lot of tabs oben, Chronium uses way more > resources because it spawns a new instance of the browser for every > tab.
Well, that is an implementation detail. What I am more afraid of is the javascript engine. With Javascript overloaded "modern" pages, just like a so called social network wit the same first letter as Fedora has in its name, are much slower in Midori. I guess Firefox > Chromium > Midori for that issue with Javascript. I can't give any hard numbers, but when I tested recently, I felt like that. > > Though, Chromium would be too much overkill for a live cd > > that's called Xfce. That's only as a side note, I wouldn't bring in > > Chromium in this saving space discussion. > > Chronium will never get into Fedora unless Google stops forking all > random libraries. See http://spot.livejournal.com/312320.html "Chromium isn't stable." Haha, good point. Is Fedora stable? Okay, maybe the live spins are. Thanks for the link. Are you sure you're talking about Chromium and not Chrome? Chromium doesn't need any additional patches here on ArchLinux. Anyways, Chromium is out of scope to discuss here for several reasons. Sorry that I mentioned it at all. -R. _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
