On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:09:20 +0100 Raphael Groner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I just wanted to sum up what's the possible solution so far for > the end user. But you can do it obviously much shorter. :) Yeah. We might want to make a note in release notes or have a wiki page to point people to... > I don't understand how the session is related to that issue in any > case > > xfce4-power-manager uses a dbus interface to instruct the power > management component. Is upower already merged to systemd, will it be > in some future version (any plans to do that)? I don't know off hand. > KDE (and GNOME) have similiar issues. The main bug seems to be. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859227 Yeah, I am seeing that same thing here with inhibit... ;( > - and then for GNOME in particular: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859224 > > I tend to give up on that hibernate/suspend/sleep well/simulate death > thingy when reading through all those comments. WTF external monitors > need special handling? Cause it gets more and more complex. Yeah, it > should be routed to the end user that can configure it fully like she > wants. SCNR to do some trolling here. Yeah, ideally users only need to configure things in xfce4-power-manager and not change random config files and hunt around. ;( kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
