On 1/22/2013 4:09 PM, James Freer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Miller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:02:35AM +0000, James Freer wrote: >>> I looked at that location and that's why i thought when installing F17 >>> that was the latest version. F18 goes down as the latest release but >>> no one says what problems they had with it. >> >> There's actually been a long, ongoing discussion about it. You can look at >> Fedora meeting archives or on the devel list for details. The primary delay >> in this case is the landing of the re-written Anaconda installer. >> >> Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <[email protected]> > > I wondered if that was the problem as folk seem to have trouble with > F18. Personally i've been thinking again about 6 month releases. There > simply doesn't seem to be the time for developers to sort of > problems.... why not an annual release. The bi-annual release of > *buntu LTS means in the 2nd year apps being out of date. The 6 month > release seems to mean a lot of hard work in a short space of time.
I do not now, nor have I ever, looked at the number of people that have problems, and yes there are some, as a true representative number of a distributions users. The users that have true problems ask for help. Or rant. :-) While those of us that do not have problems do not write. My guess? The number of users without problems far exceeds the number that do. Now a personal request. Please. Please don't start the semiannual thread about the release schedule time period. :-) -- David _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
